Two Chester residents have been prosecuted after failing to prove that household waste they paid to have removed was passed to an authorised person and disposed of legally.
Gavin Roebuck, 38, of Fairford Road, Chester, and Nicola Ray, 36, of Meynell Place, Blacon, were sentenced at court on 20 May 2026 after pleading guilty to offences linked to household waste duty of care.
Both cases were brought after investigations by Cheshire West and Chester Council’s Public Protection service. The prosecutions centred on Section 34 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990, which places a legal responsibility on householders to take reasonable steps over where their waste goes.
£440 penalties after missed fixed penalty notices
Nicola Ray told the court she had paid £100 for waste to be removed, but could not provide further details about the company or person involved. She was fined £100 and ordered to pay £300 in costs and a £40 victim surcharge.
Gavin Roebuck also said he had paid £100 to a third party to remove waste, but was unable to provide further information. He received the same penalty: a £100 fine, £300 in costs and a £40 victim surcharge.
The council said both defendants had been given the opportunity to engage with investigators but did not do so. They also failed to pay fixed penalty notices before the cases reached court.
The outcome puts the total court bill for each defendant at £440, not including the original payment they said they made for waste removal.
Household waste checks before handing rubbish over
The prosecutions underline a risk that often catches residents after a clear-out, move or garden job: paying someone to take rubbish away does not end the householder’s responsibility if the waste is later dumped illegally.

Under the duty of care rules, residents are expected to check that anyone collecting their waste is authorised to carry it. That means using a registered waste carrier and keeping enough information to show who took the waste and where it was meant to go.
Cheshire West and Chester Council said residents should check waste carriers on the GOV.UK register, ask where the waste will be taken, and keep a record or receipt for the transaction.
For householders, the most useful evidence is practical: the collector’s name or business name, waste carrier registration details, vehicle details where available, the date of collection, the amount paid and a receipt or written message confirming the job. Without those records, it can be difficult to show that reasonable checks were made.
Similar enforcement action has been taken in other areas where dumped rubbish was traced back to household waste, including a Havering fly-tipping case involving bags left in the street.
Council action on environmental crime
The council said illegal dumping can cause environmental harm and affect local communities. Fly-tipped waste can leave public land blocked, create clean-up costs and draw complaints from residents who are not responsible for the original rubbish.
The Chester cases were investigated by the Public Protection service and prosecuted by the council’s legal team. The authority said enforcement action will be taken where there is enough evidence that the duty of care has not been met.
Residents who suspect fly-tipping can report it through the Cheshire West and Chester Council website. The council said it will continue to work with partners to tackle environmental crime and protect local communities.
Source: Cheshire West and Chester Council
Source check Source trail
This report is based on the Cheshire West and Chester Council notice and keeps the penalties, dates and legal references aligned with that source.
- Checked the named defendants, ages and Chester addresses against the source notice.
- Matched the court date of 20 May 2026 and the guilty pleas stated by the council.
- Confirmed the fines, costs and victim surcharges listed for both defendants.
- Retained the legal reference to Section 34 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990.
- Source
- Cheshire West and Chester Council
- Scope
- Chester
- Updated
- 2026-05-27 17:22
Source check
Report a trust issue
Send a clear signal to community moderation if the source, facts or context need review.
Article contextPeople & topics2#7
What do you think about this article?
Reader Ideas Newsroom
Have a sharper angle for this topic? Add it to the community idea board and let readers vote it up for editorial review.
/linkComments
8+ useful words can earn +10-60 DP; shorter replies can still publish without DP.